翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Four Winds (disambiguation)
・ Four Winds (New Orleans)
・ Four Winds Casinos
・ Four Winds Dowagiac
・ Four Winds Field at Coveleski Stadium
・ Four Winds Hartford
・ Four Winds hat
・ Four Winds New Buffalo
・ Four Winds Press
・ Four Winds the Walker
・ Four Wives
・ Four Women
・ Four Women (comics)
・ Four Women (song)
・ Four Women of Egypt
Four Word Film Review
・ Four World Trade Center
・ Four Worlds
・ Four Year Plan
・ Four Year Plan (Poland)
・ Four Year Strong
・ Four Year Strong (album)
・ Four Yogas
・ Four Yorkshiremen sketch
・ Four!
・ Four'N Twenty meat pie
・ Four's a Crowd
・ Four, Isère
・ Four-acceleration
・ Four-and-Twenty


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Four Word Film Review : ウィキペディア英語版
Four Word Film Review
The Four Word Film Review (FWFR) is an interactive website founded in 1999 by Benj Clews. It is an online database of film summaries, all written in four words or fewer and submitted by site members. The database currently contains more than 275,000 reviews covering some 25,000 films.〔(Four Word Film Review )〕
The Four Word Film Review was nominated in 2005 for a Webby Award〔(Webby Awards )〕 in the Humor category.
==Reviews==
Users of the site, or "FWFRers" (sometimes pronounced "fwiffers"), write the reviews and submit them for site publication. Submitted reviews are put on the FWFRer’s Pending Approval list. Clews and a team of anonymous volunteer editors (called "MERPs", an acronym for the site's Multiple Editor Review Processing system) to weed out submissions according to broadly defined selection guidelines. If the review passes the Pending Approval process, it is added to the site and other FWFRers have the opportunity to vote on it.
Exactly what constitutes an “acceptable” Four Word Film Review is often a source of heated debate on the site’s message board. The general rules are listed in the site's FAQ, although their interpretation is ever evolving, subject to both the decisions of the site’s creator/owner, and the interpretation of the MERPs.〔(FWFR Frequently Asked Questions )〕
One common reason for the editors to decline a submitted review is that it is "too generic," meaning it doesn’t make specific enough reference to the film in question and may include fanboy statements. According to the site's FAQ, other reasons a review may be declined include exceeding the four-word limit, using a quotation from the film itself rather than written in the voice of the site user, similarity to one that is already posted, or being incomprehensible to MERPs. The reviewer is entitled to one appeal for a declined review, in which the user may explain the review and reasons why it should be accepted. Appeals are limited to 100 characters or fewer. All submissions and declines are ultimately at Clews' discretion except for the rule that all reviews must be four words or fewer.〔(Appealing declines )〕
Every page of the website features a “What Film?” box, which randomly selects one of the many thousands of reviews. The "What Film?" box allows the visitor to guess which film to which it refers, then follow a link to the film to see if he or she was correct. The box reflects the site's philosophy that it must be possible to deduce a film from its review.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Four Word Film Review」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.